Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston will release their new movies on the same day. Jennifer's film He's Just Not That Into You, and Angie's movie Changeling are both scheduled to release on October 24, according to Us Magazine.
Aniston plays Ben Affleck's lover in the adaptation of the famous relationship book, He's Just Not That Into You. Hilarious, watch the trailer. Jen rakes in about 8 mill a movie, while Angelina brings in about $12-15 million.
Changeling, is a film based on true events in the 1920's about an LA woman named Christine Collins (Jolie) whose child is kidnapped and returned. The woman starts to think that maybe the returned child isn't hers. Creepy. So, who will bring in the most? I'm calling Aniston on this one.
Us Magazine/PR Photos
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Aniston vs. Jolie
Posted by Gabs at 8:48 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 Say something!:
Aniston wins Box Office (PG-13 to R)
Jolie gets a boatload of awards nominations.
There are no losers. Only women who have NOT won Academy Awards ;)
If Brad and Angie's 'charity' and 'humanitarian' work is legit, then why don't they donate directly to the most efficient charities to begin with? Why must the funds be donated to their own foundation first? Why are the donations to and from the Jolie-Pitt Foundation publicized so often within a week of their latest film or DVD release? Why isn't their foundation rated by any independent charity watchdog? Why havn't they spent or granted the majority of their funding so far directly on 'humanitarian' work? Why are the private jets and super high-end accomodations around the world necessary to promote 'good will'? Why would Brad Pitt compete for funding, awareness, and support with the most efficient home building charity organization in the world (Habitat For Humanity)? Why not just endorse and support Habitat instead?
Why in the name of all that is right and logical would a 'humanitarian' squander such obscene levels of limited life sustaining resources on multiple mansions, private jet rides, private helicopter rides, and super exclusive super high-end accomodations around the world? Why in the name of all that is right and logical would a 'humanitarian' deliberately concentrate the world's wealth and resources? Why would they DELIBERATELY expand the gap between the rich and poor? Why would they promote, accept, and celebrate the concept of extreme wealth or obscene compensation for the making of movies? Even now when so many people worldwide struggle to survive? Why not call for a more reasonable, moral, and logical pay-scale for all people? Why not call for a more reasonable distribution of wealth? WHY ARE HOLLYWOOD HUMANITARIANS SUCH DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOBS?
Post a Comment